Iga Swiatek and Elena Rybakina convincingly reached the third round of Wimbledon, while Amanda Anisimova needed a nail-biting victory to advance. Polish world star Swiatek showed why she is considered one of the big favorites on the famous grass courts of the All England Club. She played with an efficiency in the second round that left no opening for her opponent, quickly settling the match.
Rybakina, the Kazakh defending champion, followed suit with a similarly dominant display. Her powerful play proved almost untenable on this surface, allowing her to reach the next round without much difficulty. Both ladies appear to have clearly defined their title ambitions with their efficient performances in the early stages of the tournament.
While the established ones lived up to their status, it was a completely different experience for Amanda Anisimova. The American, who is making a remarkable comeback in women's tennis, had a tough time in her second round match. Instead of an easy victory, she had to put up a real fight to control the match.
It was a test of character that she barely passed, which underlines her will to survive in the London grass. Her performance is in stark contrast to the routine victory of her competitors, but proves even more her mental resilience. The difference in playing style and course of the matches between these three women is striking.
Swiatek and Rybakina radiate the calm and self-confidence of players who are used to winning on big stages. Anisimova, on the other hand, had to rely on her fighting spirit and experience to get the job done. Her victory symbolizes not only a technical achievement, but also a personal triumph in her rehabilitation to the top of international tennis.
The dynamics on grass remain a crucial factor in these early rounds. The surface rewards aggressive and precise play, which Swiatek and Rybakina exploit perfectly with their fast strokes and strong serves. For Anisimova, who traditionally excels on hard courts and clay, the grass represents an extra challenge.
Yet her victory shows that high-level adaptability remains possible, even on a surface that is less her own. The third round brings a new phase with higher risks for all three players. Swiatek and Rybakina must maintain their dominant form against opponents who, like them, take the tournament seriously.
Anisimova's survival in round two could be a wake-up call: her next opponent will approach her with more respect, but also with more confidence in their own abilities. The pressure is mounting on the comeback candidate, and her ability to translate that pressure into performance will be tested in the coming days. The matches of Swiatek and Rybakina were not only dominance on the court, but also a statement to the rest of the field.
Both players have proven in the past that they can excel on grass, and their current form confirms that they are still the biggest threats to the title. For Anisimova, the challenge now is to maintain her momentum and grow in confidence despite the physical and mental strain of her recent battle. What follows is a crucial phase in the tournament for all three players.
For Swiatek and Rybakina, the focus will be on maintaining this high level and taking down increasingly tough opponents as they move closer to finals week. Anisimova must recover from the physical and mental exertion of her last match and try to turn her difficult qualifying into momentum. The third round often serves as the real starting point of the title battle, and with these three players in the running, it promises to be an exciting follow-up phase.
"We see that the top of women's tennis on grass is still dominated by a select group of players," said a commentator during the live broadcast. Read at NOS Sport
Why this matters
Swiatek and Rybakina's performances are crucial as they confirm the form at the top of the women's rankings and underline their intention to win the title. Their dominance in the early rounds builds pressure on the rest of the field. At the same time, Anisimova's victory is an important narrative for the tournament; it shows that comeback stories are still alive and well and that the competition is not only defined by the top seeds, but also by the unpredictability and resilience of players who fight back to the top. For Anisimova, this phase is a test case: can she translate her mental resilience into consistent performance at the highest level?
Frequently asked
How did Swiatek and Rybakina perform in the second round?
Both players easily qualified for the third round. They showed no doubts and dominated their matches on the grass of Wimbledon.
What was the progression for Amanda Anisimova?
Anisimova had a tough road to the third round. She had to play a tough match and go deep to secure her spot in the next round.
Why is Anisimova's performance important?
Her victory marks a significant comeback in the female tennis world. It shows her mental strength and resilience after a period of absence.
How important is grass for Swiatek and Rybakina?
Grass is a surface where both players excel. Their aggressive playing style and strong serve fit perfectly with the demands of grass, which explains their dominant performance.
What challenges does the third round bring?
The third round is often a turning point where opponents become more serious. Swiatek and Rybakina need to maintain their form, while Anisimova needs to turn her momentum into consistent performances.
