- Why did Galthié keep Auradou and Jegou in the group despite their legal affairs?
- Galthié justified his decision by sporting performance and confidence in the players. The two men, suspended then reinstated after a dismissal, are considered essential to the collective. The FFR did not comment, favoring the sporting aspect.
- What are the charges against Auradou and Jegou in Argentina?
- The two players were accused of rape in Argentina, facts dating back to March 2023. They obtained a dismissal of the charges in June 2024, which allowed their administrative reintegration in France.
- How does the FFR handle legal cases involving its players?
- The FFR relies on local judicial decisions to reinstate its players. It does not judge extra-sporting matters, but administratively suspends players in the event of involvement, as for Auradou and Jegou in March 2024.
- What is at stake in the match against the All Blacks for Auradou and Jegou?
- Their start against New Zealand is a test of credibility. A good performance could attenuate criticism, while a failure could risk relaunching the debate on the management of legal affairs by the FFR.
- Has the FFR taken a position on the merits of the legal cases?
- No. The FFR has chosen not to comment on the cases themselves, limiting itself to the sporting decision. It sticks to the dismissals obtained by the players to justify their reinstatement.
- What was the reaction of the sponsors to the tenure of the two players?
- The reaction from sponsors was mixed. Some historical partners expressed their concern, while others reaffirmed their support for the team. This division reflects the tensions between public image and sporting performance in French rugby.
