- How did PSG’s midfield rebuild differ from United’s approach?
- PSG focused on technical midfielders with high ceilings (Vitinha, Ugarte, Neves) rather than targeting established stars. United’s recent midfield signings (Casemiro, Mount, Amad) were high-profile but didn’t fit their system, leading to underperformance.
- What specific traits do PSG’s midfielders share?
- All three prioritize technical ability, press resistance, and progressive passing. Vitinha and Neves are creative hubs, while Ugarte anchors the defense with elite ball-winning and passing stats.
- How much did PSG spend on their midfield rebuild?
- The trio cost €230 million combined (Vitinha €80m, Ugarte €60m, Neves €90m). United’s comparable midfield investments (Casemiro, Mount, Amad) totaled over £300 million but delivered far less output.
- Which United midfielders should be sold to fund the overhaul?
- Fred, Pellistri, and backup options like Kobbie Mainoo’s potential understudies are prime candidates. Their combined wages and lack of system fit make them ideal trade chips for PSG-style targets.
- Could United replicate PSG’s model in one transfer window?
- Unlikely. PSG’s rebuild took two years, with Vitinha arriving in January 2024 and Neves in August 2024. United need a multi-window plan, starting with January sales to fund summer targets.
- What’s the biggest risk for United if they don’t change their approach?
- Another season of midfield mediocrity, with more wasted transfer fees and missed European opportunities. The current carousel risks normalizing inconsistency at the club’s core.
%3Aquality(65)%2Fhttps%253A%252F%252Fmedia.trivela.com.br%252Fmain%252F2026%252F06%252FBarcola-PSG-scaled.jpg&w=1920&q=72&output=webp&we)
