The Big 12 Conference is refusing to withdraw its federal lawsuit challenging quarterback Brendan Sorsby’s eligibility at Texas Tech, instead using the litigation as leverage while it waits for Sorsby’s NFL decision and assesses the risk of a countersuit, a league source told ESPN. The lawsuit, filed earlier this month, accuses Sorsby of tampering and violating NCAA transfer rules when he left Indiana for Texas Tech. If Sorsby declares for the 2026 NFL Draft, the eligibility dispute becomes moot, making the case a costly exercise in legal posturing.
Big 12 presidents and chancellors see the lawsuit as a test of conference power over player movement in the NIL era, where law firms increasingly replace rulebooks. The standoff mirrors the broader legalization of college sports, with the NCAA’s authority eroding as conferences and courts assume greater control. A Big 12 source, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss internal strategy, said the conference is in no hurry to drop the case.
'If Sorsby goes pro, we wasted some legal fees. If he stays and Texas Tech pushes back, we need to know where we stand legally,' the source said. ' The source added that Texas Tech’s silence on the matter has ratcheted up the uncertainty, as the conference cannot rule out a retaliatory lawsuit should it blink first.
What’s next: Sorsby is draft-eligible in 2026, and his decision timeline will likely force the Big 12’s hand by the end of the spring transfer window. If he returns to Texas Tech without a withdrawal, the case could move to discovery, exposing internal communications on both sides. Meanwhile, other conferences are watching closely, as a ruling could redefine how tampering allegations are prosecuted across Power Four football. Read at ESPN