Frenkie de Jong has lost his confidence in national coach Ronald Koeman after the painful World Cup elimination against Morocco. The FC Barcelona midfielder felt completely paralyzed in the rigid 5-2-3 system, which resulted in one of his worst games in the orange kit. Koeman's tactical blunder weighs heavily on the selection.
By choosing a formation with three central defenders and only two real midfielders, De Jong's creative space was completely taken away. While at Barcelona he is used to the freedom to dribble and make deep passes, he was reduced to a static pawn against Morocco. The match turned out to be a disaster and the 2–0 defeat was a direct result of the midfield's failure to control the match.
This tactical experiment fails not only because of the positioning, but also because of the lack of support lines in the build-up. Where De Jong can count on forward pressure and dynamic attackers who create space in Catalonia, the Dutch team remained static in a block against Morocco. The balance between defense and attack was lost, which meant that the midfielder was constantly surrounded by opponents.
Without the option to play out to the sides or cross deep, the Netherlands' game descended into a risky ball possession, exactly what a player of his caliber should avoid. The choice of a three-man defense fundamentally changes the geometry of the midfield. Where a traditional 4-3-3 formation provides a triangle that allows circulation and progression, the 5-2-3 isolates the double checker.
De Jong thrives on receiving the ball between the lines while watching the game, a luxury he is denied when he is only flanked by a defensive midfielder without a deep running 'number ten'. This isolation forces him to make horizontal passes, which neutralizes his greatest weapon - vertical dribbling towards the heart of the defense. It's not just a bad fit, but a tactical denial of his playing profile.
The clash between the star player and the national coach reveals a deeper problem within the KNVB: the unwillingness to bend the system to the available quality. Koeman seems stuck in rigid dogmas about control, while the current generation demands flexibility and dominance in midfield. By consciously ignoring the team's strongest strength, the coach not only undermines De Jong, but also the authority of the technical staff.
It's a recipe for a dressing room revolt, with players feeling forced to choose between the coach's tactical outline and their own football intuition. This friction reveals a recurring pattern in Koeman's coaching career: the struggle to modernize his approach. As the football world has moved to fluid positional play, Koeman often reverts to reactive safety nets.
By prioritizing defensive structure over creative expression, he indirectly signals a lack of confidence in his players' ability to dominate possession. For a nation built on the philosophy of 'Total Football' and technical superiority, seeing the most talented technician shackled by conservatism is not just a tactical error, but an identity crisis. The unwillingness to give De Jong control suggests a coach who fears losing control more than strives for winning.
The discontent is no longer behind closed doors. De Jong made it clear afterwards that he is not happy with the role that has been assigned to him. It is a rare moment of open criticism from a player who usually puts the team above himself.
This tension suggests that Koeman's tactical idea is clashing with the natural playing style of his key creative. If the engine malfunctions, the car cannot drive, and that realization is now also dawning on the technical staff. What follows now is a crucial turning point for Dutch football.
The KNVB must face the fact that a conflict between the national coach and the best player can be disastrous for the preparation for the 2024 European Championship. The pressure on Koeman to reconsider his system will increase enormously. If he sticks to this formation, he risks not only the departure of De Jong from the starting line-up, but also a complete implosion of team morale.
The upcoming international matches will determine whether the trainer can convince the player, or whether the player dismisses the trainer. Read at Soccernews.nl
Why this matters
If De Jong openly distances himself from Koeman, an untenable situation will arise within the selection that will increase the pressure on the national coach. The KNVB faces a dilemma: sticking to the current course risks failure at the 2024 European Championship, while a change of course is necessary to keep the star player satisfied and the team to perform. The future of the Dutch team is at stake.
Frequently asked
Why is Frenkie de Jong angry with Ronald Koeman?
De Jong is frustrated because Koeman's 5-2-3 system tactically paralyzed him during the World Cup elimination against Morocco. This resulted in one of his worst games for the Dutch team.
What system did the Dutch team play against Morocco?
Koeman opted for a 5-2-3 formation with three defenders and two midfielders. This system gave De Jong insufficient space and freedom to make his play.
What are the consequences for the 2024 European Championship?
The tension could force the KNVB to change course. If Koeman does not make adjustments, the Dutch team threatens to start the tournament without its most important playmaker.