ESPN’s NFL crew rolls out one last roster shake-up per team before 2026, mixing blockbusters with surgical fixes to expose every front office’s remaining ambition. The moves reveal which teams still have cap room, which are stuck in neutral
ESPN’s NFL crew delivered a one-move-per-team offseason wish list ahead of 2026, forcing every front office to answer the same question: what’s left to fix? The slate of proposals ranges from obvious upgrades to calculated gambles, spotlighting remaining roster gaps before training camp. Kansas City lands Deebo Samuel to replace the departed JuJu Smith-Schuster, while Tampa Bay extends Baker Mayfield after his 2025 resurgence under Todd Bowles.
Arizona, meanwhile, sends Josh Sweat to a contender in exchange for a third-round pick and a late-round swap, clearing cap space while addressing a thin edge-rusher market. The Chiefs’ move is the most immediate impact play: Samuel’s 1,400-yard, 12-touchdown 2024 season makes him the perfect high-upside replacement for Smith-Schuster, whose departure leaves a 327-catch void over the last two years. Kansas City’s cap sheet still has room under the 2026 cap floor, and pairing Patrick Mahomes with Samuel’s after-the-catch ability could push the offense into another stratosphere.
The Buccaneers’ extension for Mayfield—reportedly a three-year, $105 million deal with $60 million guaranteed—reflects a front office betting on continuity after a 4,000-yard, 28-TD season and a playoff berth. The Cardinals’ Josh Sweat trade solves two problems: it unclogs the defensive end logjam while adding draft capital to a roster already stocked with young talent. ESPN’s crew didn’t shy from the unconventional.
The New York Giants, for instance, are advised to package Daniel Jones and a first-rounder for a top-tier QB like Caleb Williams, betting on a rebuild reset rather than incremental improvement. The Las Vegas Raiders land Stefon Diggs in a swap for Davante Adams, reuniting the duo that terrorized defenses in Buffalo and forcing a retooling of Derek Carr’s supporting cast. J.
Moore to the Atlanta Falcons for a haul that includes a first-rounder and a mid-round selection, freeing cap space while addressing Atlanta’s WR-needy roster. The Giants’ hypothetical Williams deal isn’t just about the quarterback upgrade—it’s a referendum on Jones’ long-term role in New York. 2), but the Giants’ 9-8 record underscored the lack of surrounding talent.
Shipping Jones and a first-rounder would signal a full reset, but it requires Williams’ willingness to join a rebuilding roster and the Giants’ front office to accept the short-term pain of a QB carousel. 5 yards per catch in 2024, but whose contract demands ($20M APY) could force Las Vegas to restructure elsewhere to avoid cap hell. The Bears’ Moore trade exposes a deeper trend: even teams coming off strong seasons are willing to move proven starters if the return is too tantalizing.
Moore’s 1,364-yard, 10-TD 2024 campaign makes him a clear upgrade for Atlanta’s WR-starved offense, while the haul—including a first-rounder—gives Chicago the flexibility to address other needs. This mirrors the Ravens’ 2023 move of Lamar Jackson to the bench in favor of a draft-day haul, proving that front offices are increasingly prioritizing asset accumulation over short-term wins. Reactions from around the league have been predictable: front offices stayed mum, while analysts dissected the cap math and positional fits.
Chiefs GM Brett Veach didn’t comment on Samuel but emphasized “maximizing every asset” in a recent interview. ” What’s next: Training camps open in late July, and the first dominoes could fall before then if any of these scenarios gain traction. The Chiefs and Buccaneers moves are the most likely to materialize given their cap health and personnel turnover.
The Cardinals’ Sweat trade hinges on finding the right contender with mid-round draft capital to spare. For fans, this exercise is a reminder that the offseason isn’t over—it’s just entered its most unpredictable phase. The Giants’ Williams scenario, while unlikely, keeps the QB carousel spinning, while the Raiders’ Diggs move could redefine Las Vegas’ offensive identity overnight if it materializes. Read at ESPN
With the NFL’s usual free-agency frenzy winding down, ESPN’s one-move-per-team proposal turns remaining roster gaps into a pressure test for front offices. It forces fans and executives alike to confront hard truths about cap flexibility, positional value, and the cost of inaction. Whether these moves happen or not, the exercise sharpens the conversation around team-building ahead of 2026, exposing which franchises still have the juice to swing blockbusters—and which are stuck in neutral. The Giants’ Williams scenario highlights the league’s QB panic: even teams with competent signal-callers are willing to burn bridges for perceived generational talent, while the Raiders’ Diggs move underscores how veteran stars can reset franchise trajectories when paired with the right system. The Bears’ Moore trade reflects a broader shift toward asset accumulation, where proven starters are treated as tradeable commodities if the return is too compelling.
ESPNespn.comBy Aaron SchatzJun 18, 4:21 PMen
From Alstott’s record to modern backs, the franchise’s ground-game greats who built Tampa Bay’s identity over 50 seasons.
Arizona State has two first-round NFL picks for the first time in 25 years, and a sharper recruiting pitch.
