England scraped past the Democratic Republic of the Congo with a 2-1 victory, but Harry Kane’s late heroics cannot paper over the systemic cracks emerging in Thomas Tuchel’s setup. The Three Lions looked anything but assured, requiring a brace from their captain to overturn a deficit and keep their World Cup trajectory intact. While Kane delivered the clinical finishing required at this level, the performance was marred by a disjointed defensive structure that Congo exploited with ease.
The scoreline flatters a side that struggled to impose control for large periods, relying on individual brilliance rather than collective cohesion. The most glaring concern remains the tactical farce unfolding at right-back, a position Tuchel has seemingly failed to solve since taking the helm. In a shocking display of squad mismanagement, five different players have been deployed in the role recently, including central midfielder Declan Rice and center-back Ezri Konsa.
This desperate carousel highlights a lack of specialized options or a refusal to trust natural defenders, forcing square pegs into round holes against elite opposition. The continued omission of Trent Alexander-Arnold defies tactical logic, especially given the chaos unfolding elsewhere. With Djed Spence and Aaron Wan-Bissaka also failing to nail down the spot, Tuchel’s rigidity is turning a position of strength into a critical vulnerability.
The experimentation has not yielded stability; instead, it has exposed a squad lacking depth in key transitional areas, leaving the backline exposed to counter-attacks. Utilizing a world-class defensive midfielder like Declan Rice in a full-back role is not merely a tactical gamble; it is a strategic error that hollows out the team's engine room. By shifting Rice to the flank, Tuchel compromises the side's ability to control transitions, leaving the central channel exposed when possession is turned over.
This domino effect weakens the entire spine of the team, forcing the remaining midfielders to cover excessive ground and leading to the kind of disorganized pressing that Congo exploited repeatedly. Furthermore, the refusal to integrate specialists like Alexander-Arnold suggests a deeper disconnect between the coaching staff and the squad’s actual skillset. While Tuchel demands defensive rigidity, his current approach creates a paradox where he sacrifices natural width and creativity for a defensive solidity that simply isn't materializing.
This stubbornness risks alienating key players and wasting valuable preparation time that should be spent refining a cohesive unit rather than conducting live experiments on the international stage. This chaotic approach to selection undermines confidence just as the tournament enters its sharp end. Relying on world-class forwards to bail out a confused defensive unit is an unsustainable strategy for any team with genuine aspirations of lifting the trophy.
The Congo defeat exposed more than just tactical flaws; it revealed a psychological fragility within the squad. Repeated defensive errors under pressure suggest a team unraveling when the stakes rise, a trait no side aspiring to win a World Cup can afford. The late winner masked the underlying anxiety, but the body language and hesitant clearances spoke volumes about a group questioning its own resilience.
This is not the mark of a team built for tournament football, where composure under fire is non-negotiable. England’s defensive structure now resembles a house of cards, with each misplaced experiment further destabilizing the foundation. The right-back carousel is not just a tactical quirk; it is a symptom of a broader malaise where no position feels settled.
With Kane carrying the offensive burden and midfielders forced into unnatural roles, the squad’s identity has evaporated. Tuchel’s insistence on rigid systems without the personnel to execute them is a recipe for disaster against teams like Mexico, who thrive on exploiting disorganization. " He sidestepped questions about the right-back carousel, instead praising the team’s "mental strength" in grinding out the result.
The lack of clarity from Tuchel only deepened concerns about his long-term plan, with reporters pressing for specifics on how he intends to address the defensive chaos before the Mexico showdown. What's next: England’s right-back crisis must be resolved within 48 hours if they are to stand a chance against Mexico. Tuchel faces a binary choice: either trust a specialist like Alexander-Arnold or commit to a makeshift solution.
The Mexico fixture will expose whether this carousel is a temporary blip or a terminal flaw. With the knockout stages looming, there is no room for further experiments. Read at Independent Sport
Why this matters
England’s defensive chaos risks derailing their World Cup ambitions, with Tuchel’s tactical rigidity and squad gaps forcing makeshift solutions in a critical knockout clash. If the manager cannot solve the right-back riddle, the team’s structural integrity will collapse against higher-tier opposition, rendering Kane’s attacking prowess irrelevant. The Congo defeat exposed psychological fragility, raising questions about the squad’s resilience when the tournament pressure intensifies.
Frequently asked
How did England perform against Congo?
England struggled to a 2-1 win, needing a Harry Kane brace to come from behind. The victory masked significant defensive issues and a lack of control throughout the match.
What is the right-back crisis?
Thomas Tuchel has used five different players at right-back, including midfielders Declan Rice and Ezri Konsa. This lack of consistency has exposed the team defensively and baffled observers.
Why was Trent Alexander-Arnold omitted?
The enrichment notes his omission defies logic given the struggles in that position. Tuchel has preferred to utilize midfielders and other defenders instead of the natural playmaker.
Who is up next for England?
England faces Mexico in their next fixture. This match will serve as a critical test for Tuchel to fix his defensive setup before the knockout stages intensify.
How has the Congo defeat impacted England psychologically?
The late winner masked underlying anxiety, with defensive errors under pressure revealing a squad questioning its own resilience. The body language and hesitant clearances suggested a team unraveling when stakes rise.
What does Tuchel’s post-match response indicate?
Tuchel admitted the team wasn’t at its best but called the win "important for morale." His refusal to address the right-back crisis raised further concerns about his long-term plan ahead of Mexico.
%2Fhttps%253A%252F%252Fmedia.solobasket.com%252Fmain%252F2026%252F06%252FNS-Player-Composite-White-Email-SoloBasket.png&w=1920&q=72&output=webp&we)
